Long noncoding RNA H19 accelerates tenogenic differentiation by modulating miR-140-5p/VEGFA signaling.

Rotator cuff tear (RCT) is a common tendon injury, but the mechanisms of tendon healing remain incompletely understood. Elucidating the molecular mechanisms of tenogenic differentiation is essential to develop novel therapeutic strategies in clinical treatment of RCT. The long noncoding RNA H19 plays a regulatory role in tenogenic differentiation and tendon healing, but its detailed mechanism of action remains unknown. To elucidate the role of H19 in tenogenic differentiation and tendon healing, tendon-derived stem cells were harvested from the Achilles tendons of Sprague Dawley rats and a rat model of cuff tear was established for the exploration of the function of H19 in promoting tenogenic differentiation. The results showed that H19 overexpression promoted, while H19 silencing suppressed, tenogenic differentiation of tendon-derived stem cells (TDSCs). Furthermore, bioinformatic analyses and a luciferase reporter gene assay showed that H19 directly targeted and inhibited miR-140-5p to promote tenogenic differentiation. Further, inhibiting miR-140-5p directly increased VEGFA expression, revealing a novel regulatory axis between H19, miR-140-5p, and VEGFA in modulating tenogenic differentiation. In rats with RTC, implantation of H19-overexpressing TDSCs at the lesion promoted tendon healing and functional recovery. In general, the data suggest that H19 promotes tenogenic differentiation and tendon-bone healing by targeting miR-140-5p and increasing VEGFA levels. Modulation of the H19/miR-140-5p/VEGFA axis in TDSCs is a new potential strategy for clinical treatment of tendon injury.

Arthroscopic Hip Surgery versus Conservative Therapy on Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of RCTs.

To determine the outcome and differences between arthroscopic hip surgery and conservative therapy in patients suffering from femoroacetabular impingement syndrome, we searched articles from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science and Clinicaltrials.gov using a Boolean search algorithm. Only randomized controlled trials comparing arthroscopic hip surgery and conservative therapy were included in this meta-analysis of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome management. Two authors determined eligibility, extracted the needed data and assessed the risk of bias of eligible studies independently. Then we meta-analyzed three articles to assess pooled estimate size (ES) and 95% confidence interval for Hip Outcome Score of activities of daily living (HOS ADL subscale), Hip Outcome Score sport (HOS sports subscale) and International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33) analyses were performed by using STATA version 14.0 MP (STATA, College Station, TX, USA) with the principal summary measures are mean between group difference, sample size, and standard deviation. We collected 52 articles in total after removing duplicates and screened by titles and abstracts. A total of three RCTs were included finally. There was definite evidence of additional benefit of arthroscopic hip surgery against conservative therapy in the field of improving quality of life (three trials, 575 participants, ES = 2.109, 95% CI: 1.373 to 2.845, I2  = 42.8%, P = 0.000) and activity of daily living (two trials, 262 participants, ES = 9.220, 95% CI: 5.931 to 12.508, I2  = 16.5%, P = 0.000). However, no significant difference could be seen in sports function improvement (two trials, ES = 7.562, 95% CI: -2.957 to 18.082, I2  = 60.1%, P = 0.159). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that arthroscopic hip surgery provided essential benefit compared with conservative therapy in improving activity of daily living and quality of life.

[A comparative study between humeral head prosthesis replacement and internal fixation for treatment of comminuted proximal humeral fractures].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacies of humeral head prosthesis and internal fixation in the treatment of comminuted proximal humeral fractures. METHODS: The clinical data were analyzed for the patients with comminuted proximal humeral fractures undergoing surgeries for humeral head replacement or open reduction plus internal fixation in our hospital between January 2002 and January 2009. Constant scores were used to determine the excellent clinical outcome rates in the two groups, and the operating time, blood loss and postoperative motor scores of the shoulder were compared. RESULTS: Forty patients in the humeral head replacement group were evaluated. According to the Constant scores, excellent outcomes were achieved in 16 patients, good outcomes in 18 patients, moderate in 3 patients, and poor in 3 patients, with an excellent outcome rate of 85%. In the 40 cases receiving open reduction plus internal fixation, excellent outcomes were achieved in 11 cases, good in 13 cases, moderate in 8 cases, and poor in 8 cases, with an excellent clinical outcome rate of 60%. Compared with open reduction plus internal fixation, humeral head replacement was associated with shortened operating time, reduced blood loss and better motor function recovery of the shoulder. CONCLUSIONS: Replacement of humeral head prosthesis produces better clinical outcomes than open reduction and internal fixation in patients with comminuted proximal humeral fractures, and can promote the short-term functional recovery of the shoulder with minimal surgical complications.